The Chairman of the Office Upheld the Decision in Carpathia Cartel Case, One of the Fines Subject to Reassessment

2021-01-28
The Chairman of the Office, Petr Mlsna, upheld the decision on a prohibited agreement in the field of rail freight transport, the so-called Carpathia Cartel. The Chairman of the Office upheld the first-instance decision of June 2020 on the merits, only the operative part of the decision on the fine amounting to CZK 10,000,000 imposed on ARGO LOGISTICS, s. r. o. was cancelled and the amount of fine shall be subject to reassessment of the first instance as its level was not sufficiently justified.

Petr Mlsna commented on the case as follows. “This case represents the so-called hard core restriction of the competition. These cartel agreements always distort the competition per se and are considered as the most serious threat to effective competition.”

According to the decision, AWT Čechofracht a.s., INTERFRACHT s.r.o., ARGO LOGISTICS, s.r.o., SPEDICA, s.r.o. and Rail Cargo Austria AG entered into a prohibited agreement in connection to rail freight projects called Carpathia, Sylvania and New Carpathia. On the basis of secret illegal cooperation, they allocated their customers and goods transport contracts, coordinated prices for these services and exchanged sensitive information. The cartel agreement distorted competition in the market of rail freight transport and forwarding services and was able to affect trade between the EU Member States as well. Rail freight transport companies in question infringed not only the Czech Competition Act but also Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The anticompetitive conduct of undertakings lasted between 2004 and 2013 (SPEDICA between 2008 and 2010, INTERFRACHT between 2010 and 2013). Cartel members entered into an agreement on cooperation concerning allocating of tenders. They operated reservation system in order to inform each other on the individual booked transport and their prices disabling the other participant of the agreement to offer lower price. Cartel members allocated their customers and coordinated their approach towards them.

Only INTERFRACHT and ARGO LOGISTICS filed an appeal against the first-instance decision. The Chairman of the Office dismissed their objections to a large extent; he considered only the objection of ARGO LOGISTICS on disproportionate fine as justified. This part of the decision was cancelled and the first instance will decide on the fine again.

 

Fines imposed

Rail Cargo Austria AG                                   fine not imposed (leniency)

AWT Čechofracht a.s.                                   CZK 1,826,000 (leniency II)

INTERFRACHT s.r.o.                                    CZK 2,357,000 (confirmed)

SPEDICA, s.r.o.                                             CZK 4,243,000 (settlement)

ARGO LOGISTICS, s.r.o.                              fine subject to reassessment of the first instance          

 

Press Unit of the Office

21/016

2024-04-23 / EP ENERGY TRADING Infringed Competition Act by Early Implementation of Merger With Gazela Energy The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) imposed a fine of CZK 18,840,000 on the undertaking EP ENERGY TRADING. for concluding a concentration between undertakings prior to the notification...

2024-04-18 / Sector Inquiry on Waste Management The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) has initiated a large-scale sector inquiry focused on waste management. Over the next two years, the Office shall obtain information from all...

2024-04-09 / Zásilkovna will share pick-up points thanks to the intervention of the Office, more options for consumers The Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) accepted commitments from an undertaking Zásilkovna s.r.o. consisting of an amendment to the contractual terms and conditions concluded...

2024-04-05 / Fine of CZK 8 million for Another Pet Food Distributor Forbiding Lower Prices By the first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 8,656,000 on the undertaking Dibaq a.s. for entering into prohibited agreements on...

2024-04-03 / The Office Imposed a Fine of CZK 72 million on Distributor of Moulinex, Rowenta, Krups and Tefal Products The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 72 333 000 on the undertaking Groupe SEB ČR s.r.o. for prohibited agreements on resale...

2024-02-13 / The Office Imposed a Record Fine of CZK 125 million on ELECTROLUX for Anticompetitive Conduct The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) punished the undertaking ELECTROLUX, by imposing a fine of CZK 125 404 000 for long-term anticompetitive conduct...

2024-01-19 / The Office Will Share Its Experience Using the DATACROS Tool The results of the Datacros II project, which focuses on investigating corruption, organised and financial crime using innovative techniques, will be presented on Tuesday 30 January 2024 through a public...

2024-01-16 / The Office presented a number of possibble legislative proposals to support Efficient competition The Office for the Protection of Competition drafted a proposal of possible legislative changes. The purpose of such amendments is to increase the effectiveness of the Office, in particular the detection...

If you want to recieve news by email please give us your adress and choose topic.

Email:
Significant Market Power
Public Procurement
State Aid
Competition
cs | en
+420 542 167 111 · posta@uohs.cz