Decision on cartel of construction companies confirmed, sanctiones were lowered

2016-02-08
On 8 February 2016 the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) Mr. Petr Rafaj issued a decision on the appeal against the first instance decision in case of so called construction cartel. The merits of the first instance ruling were confirmed. However, the Chairman of the Office decreased the fines imposed on particular cartel participants.

For the competition infringement in the market of engineering constructions in the Czech Republic legally effective fines of CZK 1,659,993 (approximately EUR 59,798.5) were imposed on undertakings STRABAG (CZK 497,556,000), EUROVIA CS (CZK 492,620,000), SWIETELSKY stavební (CZK 76,209,000), M-SILNICE (CZK 46,064,000), BERGER BOHEMIA (CZK 13,518,000), Skanska (CZK 529,818,000), Lesostavby Třeboň (CZK 4,208,000).

Mentioned undertakings breached the Act on the Protection of Competition by coordinating their participation and bids within the award procedures for public procurement “R4 Mirotice – Třebkov“ (apart from undertaking Lesostavby), Písek – reconstruction of the area on Bakalářích – I. phase“ (only companies Strabag and Lesostavby) and “Recontruction of Jeronýmova Street in Třeboň“ (only companies Strabag and Lesostavby).

The Office gained information on anticompetitive conduct in the course of twelve dawn-raids that were conducted within more than two-year long investigation. Gathered evidence prove that participants to the cartel agreement agreed on and prepared so called cover bids for mentioned public procurement. Some of them were intentionally incomplete or overvalued. By this means cartel participants entirely excluded the effect of competition from the award procedures and the winner was the undertaking previously chosen by the cartel.

The Chairman of the Office decided to slightly decrease the fundamental amount for the calculation of fine as the first instance decision-making body did not include in the calculation, beside the gravity of the offense, also the aspect of individual gravity of the conduct of particular parties to the proceedings.

Collusive conduct consisting of coordination of bidders, so called bid rigging, belongs to hard core cartels with the most negative impact on competition. Prior to the submission of bids participants of the award procedure agree that they will not act independently and compete with each other and that they will submit coordinated bids that will increase the price or decrease the quality of procured goods or services. The aim is to achieve better conditions for the winner of the award procedure. Bid rigging usually includes aspects of price agreements and also market sharing agreements. Detection of bid rigging is a long term priority of the Office.  

Public Relations
16/011/HS006 – R381,382,388,389,390,393,395/2015

2024-05-09 / The Office Revealed and Punished Another Cartel Agreement between Construction Companies The Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fines totalling CZK 7,442,000 on the construction companies B.H.S. BOHEMIA, a.s., SEŽEV facility s.r.o., COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. and Hroší stavby...

2024-04-23 / EP ENERGY TRADING Infringed Competition Act by Early Implementation of Merger With Gazela Energy The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) imposed a fine of CZK 18,840,000 on the undertaking EP ENERGY TRADING. for concluding a concentration between undertakings prior to the notification...

2024-04-18 / Sector Inquiry on Waste Management The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) has initiated a large-scale sector inquiry focused on waste management. Over the next two years, the Office shall obtain information from all...

2024-04-09 / Zásilkovna will share pick-up points thanks to the intervention of the Office, more options for consumers The Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) accepted commitments from an undertaking Zásilkovna s.r.o. consisting of an amendment to the contractual terms and conditions concluded...

2024-04-05 / Fine of CZK 8 million for Another Pet Food Distributor Forbiding Lower Prices By the first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 8,656,000 on the undertaking Dibaq a.s. for entering into prohibited agreements on...

2024-04-03 / The Office Imposed a Fine of CZK 72 million on Distributor of Moulinex, Rowenta, Krups and Tefal Products The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 72 333 000 on the undertaking Groupe SEB ČR s.r.o. for prohibited agreements on resale...

2024-02-13 / The Office Imposed a Record Fine of CZK 125 million on ELECTROLUX for Anticompetitive Conduct The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) punished the undertaking ELECTROLUX, by imposing a fine of CZK 125 404 000 for long-term anticompetitive conduct...

2024-01-19 / The Office Will Share Its Experience Using the DATACROS Tool The results of the Datacros II project, which focuses on investigating corruption, organised and financial crime using innovative techniques, will be presented on Tuesday 30 January 2024 through a public...

If you want to recieve news by email please give us your adress and choose topic.

Email:
Significant Market Power
Public Procurement
State Aid
Competition
Significant Market Power
cs | en
+420 542 167 111 · posta@uohs.cz