Fines for the Prague City Hall and Prague Public Transport company in the Open Card case were confirmed
The Prague City Hall violated the law when concluded seven contracts with the company HAGUESS, a.s., on the supply of license for parking card application and for the provision of operation of Prague Card Service Centre. The contracts were concluded in the negotiated procedure without publication without fulfilling statutory conditions for this type of award procedure. Public Transport Company of the Capital City of Prague concluded two contracts and two amendments for the supply of DOS software without awarding a public contract, or in the negotiated procedure without publication, and also concluded the contract on establishment and operation of the DOS contact point and the contract on providing services of drawing up technical documentation and consulting services for the usage of OpenCard in the Prague Integrated Transport system. Not even in these cases, the statutory conditions for awarding a public contract by negotiated procedure without publication were met.
The Prague City Hall selected the supplier in an open procedure, however afterwards it concluded license agreements by which the award of any subsequent related contracts to another bidder in the future was blocked. The contracting entity shall not use negotiated procedure without publication if the conditions for the use of this type of award procedure were caused by the contracting entity itself on the basis of its previous actions. The reasons for awarding contracts by negotiated procedure without publication must be given objectively, independently on the contracting entity.
Public Transport Company first concluded the contract on supply of software for ensuring functionality of DOS in relation to smart cards, with licenses for up to 50,000 users. The initial contract was however significantly extended by subsequent amendments, for example in the number of licenses for up to 650,000 users. The amendments were always awarded to the original supplier. The contracting entity was familiar with the information strategy of the capital city of Prague on the use of smart cards at the time of concluding the contract and must have known that the contract will have to be significantly extended. Therefore it is not possible to consider the conclusion of the contract and related amendments without the award procedures or in the negotiated procedure without publication as a procedure which would be in accordance with the Act on Public Contracts.
The Chairman of the Office rejected the appeal objections of both contracting entities and upheld the first-instance decision.
International and External Relations of the Office
2023-06-28 / The Office has Published the English Version of Its Annual Report 2022 The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") has published the English version of its Annual report for 2022. In the publication you will find complete statistical...
2022-09-23 / Representatives of the Review Bodies on Public Procurement Discussed in Prague the Application of Sanctions and Exclusion of Suppliers On 23 September 2022, the 11th meeting of the Network of First Instance Review Bodies on Public Procurement took place in Prague as a part of the Czech Presidency of the Council of the European Union...
2022-07-29 / Annual Report 2021 The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) publishes the English version of its Annual Report for the year 2021, during which it not only celebrated 30...
2022-04-20 / May 2022 Public Procurement Conference The Office for the Protection of Competition is preparing the first year of the May Conference on Public Procurement to be held on 18 and 19 May 2022. The conference will take place at the Brno headquarters...
2021-09-22 / The Office for the Protection of Competition commemorated 30 years of its existence at a celebratory conference The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as ''the Office'') celebrated 30 years of its existence today with a celebratory conference held at the Liechtenstein Palace in Prague...
2021-09-01 / Annual Report of the Office for the Protection of Competition 2020 The Office for the Protection of Competition has published the Annual Report, summarising its notable activities in 2020 and outlining its agenda for 2021, the year in which the Office celebrates its...
2020-12-02 / Petr Mlsna Appointed as the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition Petr Mlsna was appointed by the President of the Czech Republic, Milos Zeman, as the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition on 1 December 2020
2020-10-07 / Chairman of the Office to resign on 1 December Peter Rafaj shall resign his position of the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition with effect from 1st December 2020. Mr. Rafaj has already informed the President of the Czech Republic...
