The fine imposed on Abistore confirmed, the distributor of sports equipment dictated prices to sellers
Between 2015 and 2018, Abistore concluded and fulfilled prohibited agreements on direct determination of retail prices of sports equipment for final consumers. This practice resulted in distortion of competition on the relevant market with sports equipment within the territory of the Czech Republic.
„The distributor shall not restrict the sellers in free retail pricing for final consumers. If he enforces maintaining certain price level, he distorts competition. This conduct results in higher prices for consumers,” stated Chairman Mlsna in relation to the decision.
Abistore is active mainly in the wholesale of sports equipment (fitness equipment; products for bodybuilding; roller skates, protective gear and accessories; scooters; skateboards; ice skates; equipment for badminton, tennis, squash and table tennis; trekking poles; poles for nordic walking and accessories; equipment for swimming) mostly through B2B system without written contract, or through phone/e-mail orders. In case of some retailers, Abistore demanded strict compliance with the prices it has set. Otherwise, Abistore restricted or interrupted supply of goods or excluded the retailers from B2B system. The anticompetitive conduct of Abistore was proved mainly by e-mail exchanges seized by the Office during conducted inspections.
The Chairman of the Office dismissed the appeal of Abistore in full extent. He rejected the objections concerning non-existence of written agreements, alleged insufficiency of evidence proving anticompetitive conduct, negligibility of conduct because of low market share of Abistore or incorrect calculation of imposed fine and its eliminating effect.
Press Unit of the Office
21/025 – R092/2020
2024-04-23 / EP ENERGY TRADING Infringed Competition Act by Early Implementation of Merger With Gazela Energy The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) imposed a fine of CZK 18,840,000 on the undertaking EP ENERGY TRADING. for concluding a concentration between undertakings prior to the notification...
2024-04-18 / Sector Inquiry on Waste Management The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) has initiated a large-scale sector inquiry focused on waste management. Over the next two years, the Office shall obtain information from all...
2024-04-09 / Zásilkovna will share pick-up points thanks to the intervention of the Office, more options for consumers The Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) accepted commitments from an undertaking Zásilkovna s.r.o. consisting of an amendment to the contractual terms and conditions concluded...
2024-04-05 / Fine of CZK 8 million for Another Pet Food Distributor Forbiding Lower Prices By the first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 8,656,000 on the undertaking Dibaq a.s. for entering into prohibited agreements on...
2024-04-03 / The Office Imposed a Fine of CZK 72 million on Distributor of Moulinex, Rowenta, Krups and Tefal Products The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 72 333 000 on the undertaking Groupe SEB ČR s.r.o. for prohibited agreements on resale...
2024-02-13 / The Office Imposed a Record Fine of CZK 125 million on ELECTROLUX for Anticompetitive Conduct The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) punished the undertaking ELECTROLUX, by imposing a fine of CZK 125 404 000 for long-term anticompetitive conduct...
2024-01-19 / The Office Will Share Its Experience Using the DATACROS Tool The results of the Datacros II project, which focuses on investigating corruption, organised and financial crime using innovative techniques, will be presented on Tuesday 30 January 2024 through a public...
2024-01-16 / The Office presented a number of possibble legislative proposals to support Efficient competition The Office for the Protection of Competition drafted a proposal of possible legislative changes. The purpose of such amendments is to increase the effectiveness of the Office, in particular the detection...
