The Chairman of the Office Confirmed Fine for Resale Price Maintenance Agreements Imposed on BABY DIREKT

2021-01-05
Petr Mlsna, the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, upheld imposition of a fine amounting to CZK 40,793,000 on BABY DIREKT s.r.o. which entered into prohibited vertical resale price maintenance agreements. On the basis of an appeal, the Chairman of the Office partly changed the contested decision; however these changes do not affect the final amount of the fine.

Petr Mlsna commented on the imposed fine as follows. „This anticompetitive conduct was of a long-term nature negatively influencing not only retailers which were not able to compete on price but it resulted in higher prices of children´s goods having negative impact on families and single parents.”

BABY DIREKT, which is a distributor of children´s goods (mainly strollers, car seats, children’s furniture, vehicles, etc.), between 2011 and 2018 entered into restricted agreements mainly through oral or e-mail communication with its retailers in order to increase sale prices for final consumers to the level of its set minimum retail prices. BABY DIREKT threatened the retailers with penalties for not complying with the minimum fixed prices or even penalized them in the way of non-delivery of goods in case retailers had offered the goods for lower price. Conclusion and implementation of prohibited agreements on the direct resale price maintenance distorted competition in the relevant markets of the sale of strollers, car seats, children’s furniture and vehicles within the territory of the Czech Republic.  By its decision, the Office prohibited the performance of the mentioned agreements and imposed an obligation on BABY DIREKT to inform its retailers that these agreements have been null and void.

The Chairman of the Office within the appeal proceedings stated that the impact on the trade between the Member States of the EU and the infringement of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union mentioned in the first-instance decision had not been sufficiently proved.

The Office took into account mainly the long-term nature of the infringement of the Competition Act when imposing the fine, since the anticompetitive conduct lasted for more than 7 years in relation to the majority of its goods. Despite changes made by the Chairman, the fine would be significantly higher than 10% of the turnover, which is maximum level the Office is allowed to impose. Consequently, the imposed fine was decreased amounting to CZK 40,793,000 in order to comply with the Competition Act.

 

Press Unit of the Office
21/003 – R0206/2019

2022-09-22 / Reduced Fine for Aroma Candle Distributor, and, for the First Time, the Office Took the Compliance Program into Account The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office“) imposed a fine of CZK 17,649,000 on the undertaking Z - TRADE s. r. o. for entering into prohibited agreements...

2022-09-15 / Price Caps in the Energy Sector Do Not Mean Tolerance of Cartels, Says Petr Mlsna, Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") understands the necessity of capping energy prices, but, at the same time, warns that it will not tolerate price...

2022-09-12 / The Office Imposed Fines of CZK 280 Million on Undertakings Specialised in Issuing Food Stamps for Anti-Competitive Coordination of Terms of Trade In its first-instance decision, although not in force, the Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") imposed fines in the total amount of CZK 279,152,000 on Sodexo...

2022-08-25 / The Office Imposed Maximum Possible Fines for Obstruction of a Dawn Raid The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") has imposed the maximum possible fines on three undertakings suspected of being involved in a cartel agreement for...

2022-07-29 / Annual Report 2021 The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) publishes the English version of its Annual Report for the year 2021, during which it not only celebrated 30...

2022-07-07 / Sewing machines supplier STRIMA agreed with a settlement procedure and was thus imposed a lower fine for vertical agreements In its first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 4 446 000 on STRIMA CZECH s.r.o. for entering into prohibited...

2022-03-23 / The Office imposed fines for cartel of AV equipment suppliers By its first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fines in the total amount of CZK 2 442 000 on the undertakings AV MEDIA SYSTEMS, a.s., M plus spol. s r.o., Nowatron...

2022-03-22 / Joint statement by the European Copmpetition Network on the application of competition law in the context of the war in Ukraine The European Competition Network (ECN), which connects the competition authorities of the EU Member States, has issued a joint statement on the application of competition rules in the context of the...

If you want to recieve news by email please give us your adress and choose topic.

Email:
Significant Market Power
Public Procurement
State Aid
Competition
cs | en
+420 542 167 111 · posta@uohs.cz